Label snapshot
What the product contains and what one serving costs, according to our catalog. Label amounts are not personal dose recommendations.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| NMN | 500 mg |
Amounts are per label serving as recorded in the catalog and are not a recommendation. Testing status reflects what the brand lists. Nothing here is medical advice.
These calculations describe our scoring method. They are not a recommended dose or proof of benefit from this product.
Full trial dose, public lab certificate, tested by independent lab.
Read the evidence (3 studies)Evidence gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Safety caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
This is the strongest NMN product we've scored because it delivers the full 500mg trial dose in a sublingual powder format that may improve absorption, at one of the lowest prices per day in the category. It loses points on dose-evidence only because NMN itself sits at evidence grade B (promising human trials, but not yet the kind of multi-RCT consensus that earns an A).
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Safety flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
The main ingredients of this product, in plain language.
A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
Read about NMN →Hard numbers and independently checked status. Expand each block for its source.
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Evidence grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
4.3 out of 5 across 215 verified reviews on 3 platforms.
High confidenceConsumer sentiment compiled from 3 public sources (Examine.com, Reddit, Trustpilot).
215 reviews · 4.3/5 · positive sentiment
Renue by Science holds a 4.3/5 rating on Trustpilot from 215 reviews. Customers cite product purity and noticeable energy benefits, with ...
Compiled from a Trustpilot Renue by Science listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
1 thread discussed · positive sentiment
A Reddit user who switched from ProHealth to Renue's NMN powder says both brands are top quality with excellent customer service and reco...
Compiled from a Reddit r/NMN listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
mixed sentiment
Examine's NMN page notes emerging but still modest human trial evidence, and cites safety at doses up to 1200 mg daily for several weeks....
Compiled from an Examine.com listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
We aggregated external reviews. We didn't check their methodology. None of them are paid placements from us, but we can't guarantee the sources themselves received no product.
Renue by Science holds a 4.3/5 rating on Trustpilot from 215 reviews. Customers cite product purity and noticeable energy benefits, with a minority flagging slower order-change responses.
A Reddit user who switched from ProHealth to Renue's NMN powder says both brands are top quality with excellent customer service and recommends either one. Another thread names Renue and ProHealth as the most trusted brands for sublingual and liposomal NMN.
Examine's NMN page notes emerging but still modest human trial evidence, and cites safety at doses up to 1200 mg daily for several weeks. Effect sizes in humans are smaller than what rodent studies suggested.
Published evidence, claim checks, regulatory status and what could not be verified.
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
This is a brand-level customer-service profile for renue; it does not isolate NMN Pure Powder (Sublingual).
Community discussion exists, with positive comments about perceived sublingual absorption and affordability alongside concerns about the method’s difficulty and absorption uncertainty. No single Reddit thread is treated as a representative product review.
Renue By Science displays first-party reviews for the NMN Pure Powder product page.
This is NOT a liposomal product, it's a plain crystalline NMN powder marketed for sublingual (under-the-tongue) use, distinct from Renue's liposomal capsule line. Priced competitively at $64.95 for a ~200-serving/100-day supply at the standard 500mg trial dose.
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of NMN Pure Powder (Sublingual) and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primary sources, and publish any accepted change with a dated note. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →The next highest-scoring products in NAD+ booster, same scoring method, same rules.
DoNotAgeStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Nootropics DepotStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
DoNotAgeStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Renue By ScienceStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Renue By ScienceStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Renue By ScienceMulti-ingredient bundle
Status as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Renue By ScienceStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Renue By ScienceStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.