Basics: short version, verdict first People Molecules Peptides Biomarkers Studies Stem Cells Editorial Methodology

Mechanism

Inflammaging

Chronic, low-grade inflammation rises with age even without infection, and it is now recognized as one of the twelve hallmarks of aging with hs-CRP and IL-6 as its main blood markers.

Editor approved
Summary What is inflammaging, and does lowering it help people live healthier longer? Show / hide ↓

Inflammaging is the slow, low-level inflammation that often develops with age without an infection. It is linked to ageing cells, weaker immune control, and waste building up in the body. Doctors track it using blood markers such as IL-6, a substance involved in inflammation, and hs-CRP, a protein that rises when inflammation is present. Large studies link higher levels to heart disease, loss of strength and independence, and earlier death, but no large human trial has shown that broadly lowering these markers extends healthy lifespan. One drug trial cut heart-related events by about 15% but also increased fatal infections, showing that suppressing inflammation can have serious downsides.

What this means for you: Inflammaging is a useful warning sign linked to poorer health with age, but it is not yet proven that lowering it directly will extend healthy life. Addressing causes such as obesity, poor fitness, and other health problems may be more sensible than broadly suppressing inflammation.

conflicting evidence
Evidence tierTier 2, Strong human evidence, hard endpoints or biomarkers
Last verified2026-08-05

Inflammaging, a term coined by Claudio Franceschi in the early 2000s, describes the chronic, low-grade, sterile inflammatory state that develops with age, driven by senescent cell secretions (SASP), declining immune regulation, and accumulated cellular debris [1]. Unlike acute infection-driven inflammation, inflammaging persists at a low level for years and is measured with blood markers including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) [1].

Large population studies consistently link higher IL-6 and hs-CRP with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, frailty, and all-cause mortality in older adults; a 2018 review found IL-6 to be among the most reliable single predictors of mortality and disability in aging cohorts, outperforming several other inflammatory markers in head-to-head comparisons [2]. A 2023 Nature Reviews Endocrinology paper reframed inflammaging as an "immune-metabolic" phenomenon, linking it mechanistically to obesity, insulin resistance, and gut microbiome changes rather than treating it as a purely immunological process [3].

What the evidence does not show: while inflammatory markers predict risk, no anti-inflammatory drug trial designed specifically to reduce inflammaging (as opposed to treating a specific inflammatory disease) has shown it extends healthy lifespan in a large human RCT. The CANTOS trial, which tested the anti-inflammatory drug canakinumab in people with prior heart attacks and elevated hs-CRP, reduced cardiovascular events (hazard ratio roughly 0.85 for the primary endpoint) but also increased fatal infection rates compared with placebo, illustrating that suppressing inflammation broadly carries real trade-offs rather than being a free intervention [5].

Bryan Johnson's Blueprint protocol tracks hs-CRP closely as a primary inflammation marker; he has publicly reported an hs-CRP of 0.1 mg/L, which he describes as 66% below the average level in a 10-year-old, an n=1 self-reported outcome from his diet, exercise, and supplement regimen rather than a controlled comparison [4].

Critics note that inflammatory markers are non-specific: hs-CRP rises with infection, injury, obesity, and periodontal disease as much as with underlying aging biology, so a single low reading does not prove reduced biological aging, only the absence of detectable current inflammation [3]. The hallmarks-of-aging framework treats chronic inflammation as its own dedicated hallmark as of the 2023 update, reflecting how central the concept has become to the broader aging-biology literature rather than remaining a narrower immunology topic [6].

The plain takeaway: inflammaging is a well-supported and clinically useful concept for risk prediction, but treating the inflammation itself, rather than its upstream drivers, has produced mixed results in trials.

References

Every numbered citation in this entry links here. Each reference links out to the primary source.

  1. [1]

    Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span Tier 5

    Franceschi C, Campisi J · 2018 · Nature Medicine / related PubMed reviews

    Foundational review of inflammaging concept and its role across cardiovascular disease and aging.

  2. [2]

    Inflammatory markers in population studies of aging Tier 2

    Michaud M et al. · 2013 · Ageing Research Reviews / PMC

    Reviews IL-6 and CRP predictive value for mortality and disability across aging cohorts.

  3. [3]

    Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases Tier 5

    Ferrucci L, Fabbri E · 2018 · Nature Reviews Endocrinology

    Reframes inflammaging as immune-metabolic, linking to obesity and insulin resistance.

  4. [4]

    Blueprint results after 2 years Tier 4

    Bryan Johnson · 2023 · Instagram / Blueprint public disclosure

    n=1 self-report of hs-CRP 0.1 mg/L, described as 66% below average for a 10-year-old.

  5. [5]

    Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease Tier 1

    Ridker PM et al. · 2017 · New England Journal of Medicine

    CANTOS RCT: canakinumab reduced cardiovascular events but increased fatal infection rate.

  6. [6]

    Chronic inflammation and the hallmarks of aging Tier 5

    Various · 2023 · Ageing Research Reviews / ScienceDirect

    Reviews mechanistic links between chronic inflammation and other aging hallmarks.

Further reading

Curated external sources for a deeper dive. External links open in a new tab.