Label snapshot
What the product contains and what one serving costs, according to our catalog. Label amounts are not personal dose recommendations.
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| NMN | 1,000 mg |
Amounts are per label serving as recorded in the catalog and are not a recommendation. Testing status reflects what the brand lists. Nothing here is medical advice.
These calculations describe our scoring method. They are not a recommended dose or proof of benefit from this product.
Public lab certificate, tested by independent lab.
Read the evidence (3 studies)Evidence gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Safety caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
This Double Wood Supplements NMN Powder scores 7.7, making it a strong scorer. It delivers 1000mg of NMN, above the studied range of 250–900mg with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive). Transparency is a clear strength (score: 9.0), with third-party testing and a public lab certificate. At $2.17/day it's among the more expensive options in NAD+ booster.
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Safety flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
The main ingredients of this product, in plain language.
A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
Read about NMN →Hard numbers and independently checked status. Expand each block for its source.
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Evidence grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
Consumer signals gathered from 4 platforms.
Low confidence, small sampleConsumer sentiment compiled from 3 public sources (Examine.com, Reddit). Small sample size, treat as directional only.
1 thread discussed · negative sentiment
A Reddit thread asking about Double Wood NMN cites a claim that someone who tested the product found no detectable NMN in it. The poster ...
Compiled from a Reddit r/NMN listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
1 thread discussed · negative sentiment
A separate Reddit post titled a PSA about being ripped off by Double Wood for hundreds of dollars adds to a pattern of billing and order ...
Compiled from a Reddit r/Supplements listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
mixed sentiment
Examine's NMN page says human trial results are promising but modest compared to the strong effects seen in rodent studies. Safety at up ...
Compiled from an Examine.com listing located during manual research; not independently re-verified against the live page at build time.
169 reviews · 3.8/5
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
We aggregated external reviews. We didn't check their methodology. None of them are paid placements from us, but we can't guarantee the sources themselves received no product.
A Reddit thread asking about Double Wood NMN cites a claim that someone who tested the product found no detectable NMN in it. The poster adds that people generally don't have good reviews for the brand.
A separate Reddit post titled a PSA about being ripped off by Double Wood for hundreds of dollars adds to a pattern of billing and order complaints against the brand on Reddit.
Examine's NMN page says human trial results are promising but modest compared to the strong effects seen in rodent studies. Safety at up to 1200 mg daily for several weeks is confirmed in the FAQ.
Published evidence, claim checks, regulatory status and what could not be verified.
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
This is the closest Double Wood has to a high-dose NMN option: 1000 mg per 1g scoop, right at the top of the human trial dose range. Steep per-serving cost though, $129.95/30 servings works out to roughly $4.33/day, several times pricier per mg than the capsules.
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of NMN Powder and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primary sources, and publish any accepted change with a dated note. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →The next highest-scoring products in NAD+ booster, same scoring method, same rules.
Renue By ScienceStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
DoNotAgeStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Nootropics DepotStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Double Wood SupplementsStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Double Wood SupplementsStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Double Wood SupplementsStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Double Wood SupplementsStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
Double Wood SupplementsStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.