Well-formulated: most ingredients delivered at clinically relevant doses (glycine 3000 mg, taurine 2000 mg, NMN 300 mg, fisetin 100 mg).
Daily Ultimate Longevity
Label snapshot
What the label says
What the product contains and what one serving costs, according to our catalog. Label amounts are not personal dose recommendations.
- Ingredients listed
- 9 ingredients listed largest listed: Glycine 3,000 mg
- Form
- Powder sachet
- List price (catalog, USD)
- $149.00
- Price per serving
- $4.97List price divided by servings per container. A per-day cost only if the label serving is once daily.
Reading notes
- Multi-ingredient product. Amounts are per ingredient per serving; the product is assessed as one bundle, not as a recommendation for each ingredient.
Full label record: servings, testing, ingredients
- Servings per container
- 30
- Serving size (label)
- 6.4 g
- Catalog monthly estimate
- $149.00
- Testing disclosure
- Brand lists third-party testing; no public lab certificate listedStatus as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Ingredients as listed
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Glycine | 3,000 mg |
| Taurine | 2,000 mg |
| NMN | 300 mg |
| Resveratrol | 250 mg |
| Quercetin | 250 mg |
| Fisetin | 100 mg |
| PQQ | 10 mg |
| Astaxanthin | 6 mg |
| Spermidine | 3 mg |
What to check on the label
- Whether every ingredient has its own milligram line, or several are grouped in a 'blend' with one total.
- How many capsules or scoops make a serving, and how many servings the container holds.
- Whether the ingredients you care about appear at amounts you would accept on their own. The list below shows each figure.
Amounts are per label serving as recorded in the catalog and are not a recommendation. Testing status reflects what the brand lists. Nothing here is medical advice.
Editorial score and research-dose calculations
These calculations describe our scoring method. They are not a recommended dose or proof of benefit from this product.
Tested by independent lab.
Read the evidence (3 studies)- NMN — Unauthorised Novel Food; EFSA positive safety opinion adopted 4 March 2026 at up to 300 mg/day (β-NMN, EffePharm dossier). Commission listing pending.
- Spermidine — Novel Food status for concentrates >7 mg; wheat-germ traditional food
See the 3 supporting studies
- Uthever RCT 2022 (NMN)In 66 adults aged 40-65 over 60 days, NMN (300 mg/day) increased serum NAD+/NADH by 38% versus baseline and improved SF-36 quality-of-life scores compared to placebo. Studied at 300 mg. This product: 300 mg.
- Okabe et al. 2022 (Frontiers in Nutrition) (NMN)A 30-person, 12-week RCT found 250 mg/day oral NMN significantly increased whole-blood NAD+ levels with no adverse effects. Studied at 250 mg. This product: 300 mg.
- Timmers et al. 2011 (Cell Metabolism) (Resveratrol)150 mg/day for 30 days improved metabolic profile in obese men. Studied at 150 mg. This product: 250 mg.
How we scored this product Show the full breakdown
Evidence gates dose: the evidence grade sets the ceiling, and the dose decides how much of that ceiling the product reaches. Value = inverse of price-per-trial-dose-day. Community = mean sentiment of external reviews. Safety caps applied after weighting.
This score is our editorial judgment, not a scientific standard. We combine published evidence, dose, price, transparency, and consumer signals into one composite: this is our method, not a peer-reviewed clinical rating. A higher score means a product does better on the factors we weight, not that it is medically proven to work.
Quick verdict
Our summary
Why this scored this way
This IM8 Daily Ultimate Longevity scores 6.3, making it below the site average. It delivers 3000mg of Glycine, inside the studied range of 1000–10000mg with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive). At $4.97/day it's among the more expensive options in Longevity stack.
What drives the score up
- Dose-evidence score of 6.5 shows decent alignment with trial doses.
- Tested by independent lab (transparency 7.0).
- Community score of 9.2 with positive consumer feedback.
- Glycine is dosed at the full research level with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
- NMN is dosed at the full research level with grade B evidence (promising human data, not yet comprehensive).
What drags it down
- Fisetin (100mg is 20% of the 500mg trial dose) is significantly under-dosed.
- Spermidine (3mg is 250% of the 1.2mg trial dose) is well above the trial dose. More is not always better.
- No public lab certificate available for independent verification.
- At $4.97/day it's on the expensive side.
Why you'd choose it
- You want Glycine from a IM8 product.
- You want a tested by independent lab product.
Why you might skip it
- You want a product with a publicly available CoA.
- You need a full trial dose of fisetin (this product under-doses it).
- You want a standard dose of spermidine (this product is well above it).
Question 1
Does the molecule work?
Does the molecule work?
The science behind each active ingredient, independent of which brand sells it.
Cheap amino acid with better sleep and glutathione-precursor benefits.
The 2023 sensation; species-wide lifespan extension in mice, humans unproven.
A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
The famous red-wine molecule; longevity claims have outrun the human evidence.
Best-studied 'senolytic' ingredient, though evidence is early.
Highly-hyped senolytic; the strong evidence is in mice, not people.
Promising cofactor for mitochondrial biogenesis; human evidence remains thin.
The 'sunscreen from within' with real skin, eye, and endurance data.
The autophagy-inducing polyamine; the largest human trial found no cognitive benefit.
Full ingredient breakdown
Every active in this formula, its declared dose per serving, the dose used in the primary human trial, how much of that trial dose this product delivers, and the evidence grade for the ingredient itself.
| Ingredient | Dose / serving | Research dose | % of research | Evidence grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycine | 3000 mg | 3000 mg | 100% | B |
| Taurine | 2000 mg | 3000 mg | 67% | D |
| NMN | 300 mg | 500 mg | 60% | B |
| Resveratrol | 250 mg | 500 mg | 50% | C |
| Quercetin | 250 mg | 500 mg | 50% | B |
| Fisetin | 100 mg | 500 mg | 20% | C |
| PQQ | 10 mg | 20 mg | 50% | C |
| Astaxanthin | 6 mg | 8 mg | 75% | B |
| Spermidine | 3 mg | 1.2 mg | 250% | C |
Percentages are dose per serving ÷ primary trial dose. Below 50% means the formula is unlikely to reproduce the trial outcome for that active. Grade A = multiple large human RCTs. Grade F = no human evidence. How grades work. Full glossary →
Question 2
Is this bottle good?
Is this bottle good?
The specific product: dose, price, transparency, and what buyers report.
Question 3
What's the catch?
What's the catch?
Safety flags, transparency gaps, dosing concerns, and recurring buyer complaints.
What’s inside
The main ingredients of this product, in plain language.
Cheap amino acid with better sleep and glutathione-precursor benefits.
Read about Glycine →The 2023 sensation; species-wide lifespan extension in mice, humans unproven.
Read about Taurine →A NAD+ building block that has become the most-hyped longevity molecule.
Read about NMN →The famous red-wine molecule; longevity claims have outrun the human evidence.
Read about Resveratrol →Product data & verification
Hard numbers and independently checked status. Expand each block for its source.
The numbers
Data verification
Per-ingredient breakdown
All product data is checked against original sources. Prices, doses, and testing status are updated when product pages change. Evidence grades are reviewed when new human RCTs are published. Read how we verify.
What's inside
Consumer signals
4.6 out of 5 across 952 verified reviews on 2 platforms.
Medium confidenceAuto-gathered from public review platforms via pplx_sdk fetch.
952 reviews · 4.6/5 · positive sentiment
These are consumer sentiment signals. They do not measure whether the product actually works. See our evidence section for that.
What others say, with a source hierarchy
We treat external opinion very differently depending on where it comes from. Tier A is our strongest signal. Tier C is background sentiment only. Tier Rejected is what we excluded, listed openly so you can see what we discarded.
These reviews are aggregated from third-party sources, not written by NO1GEVITY. Each entry shows its source, retrieval date, and whether the source has an affiliate or paid relationship. We do not edit reviews to change their meaning. Disclosure policy.
Independent deep reviews, lab tests, certificates of analysis
Our strongest external evidence. Long-form independent reviews, physical-product lab work, and third-party certifications.
A physiologist at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos argues IM8's 'kitchen sink' strategy violates the basic supplement principle of 'only take what you need'. El País also notes IM8 stopped shipping to Spanish customers shortly after the paper contacted the company.
Named experts describe the Beckham-branded supplements as 'meaningless nonsense' for failing to disclose per-ingredient doses.
Registered dietitians and physicians, without affiliate ties
Credentialed commentary from clinicians who disclose no paid relationship. Useful as supporting critique but not a substitute for a clinical outcome trial.
Independent dietitian walks through the label; flags underdosing on several actives and questions the value of blends without listed amounts.
Adds up IM8's amino-acid blend: 1.58 g total. Muscle protein synthesis normally needs ≥2-3 g of leucine alone, so the blend cannot plausibly drive the outcomes it is marketed toward.
Aggregated sentiment (Trustpilot, Reddit)
Mood indicator only. We never use aggregate stars as evidence of efficacy.
Aggregate score ≈ 4.5-4.6 / 5. Mood indicator only.
Sources we transparently discard
Marketing-quoted press, obviously fabricated aggregate ratings, or heavy-affiliate 'reviews'. Listed openly so you can see what we excluded.
Business journalism, not product testing. IM8 and NOVOS both quote Forbes on their own marketing pages.
Fabricated-looking average ratings and heavy affiliate links. Not usable as evidence at any tier.
Evidence, claims & regulation
Published evidence, claim checks, regulatory status and what could not be verified.
Evidence, what actually backs this product
Longevity brands rarely test their exact finished product. We separate what's tested from what's inferred.
Research behind this product
The studies that established the trial dose and evidence grade for each active ingredient in this product. Click through to read the original paper.
Claim check, vendor claims vs. our reading of the evidence
Not medical advice. We list the strongest claims made by the brand and check each against traceable evidence.
Regulatory status
Rules change often. We record when we last verified each row. See the full regulatory timeline →
What we could not verify
We list this openly. If a claim isn't backed by a source we can trace, we'd rather flag it than repeat it.
- IM8's claim that Longevity is 'the first supplement scientifically formulated to comprehensively target all 12 hallmarks of aging' — this is a marketing framing tied loosely to the real López-Otín et al. 2023 Cell paper on hallmarks of aging, but we could not verify any independent scientific body has validated that this specific ingredient list addresses all twelve hallmarks as claimed.
- Whether IM8's NMN, PQQ, or dihydroberberine sources carry independent purity certificates beyond the general NSF Certified for Sport program-level report.
- The exact current retail price at any given moment, given multiple, apparently shifting promotional price points found across 2025-2026 sources ($89-$149 one-time; $75-$119/month).
Editorial notes
Ten longevity actives at moderate doses. NMN 300mg is 30-60% of the DoNotAge dose.
Where this sits
Spot an error?
If you are the manufacturer or brand owner of Daily Ultimate Longevity and believe any data on this page is incorrect (wrong dose, wrong ingredient, wrong price, missing certification, outdated status), you can request a correction.
We review every request, verify it against primary sources, and publish any accepted change with a dated note. Corrections from brand owners are treated the same as corrections from anyone else: verified before they move.
Request a correction →Similar products
All Longevity stack →The next highest-scoring products in Longevity stack, same scoring method, same rules.
- Ingredients listed
- 2 ingredients listedlargest listed: Vitamin K2 100 µg
- Price per serving
- $0.05$29.00 · 600 servings
- Testing
- 3rd-party listed · no public lab certificate
Multi-ingredient bundle
Status as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Score & research context 7.0/10
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
- Ingredients listed
- 2 ingredients listedlargest listed: NR 250 mg
- Price per serving
- $2.00$60.00 · 30 servings
- Testing
- 3rd-party listed · no public lab certificate
Multi-ingredient bundle
Status as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Score & research context 6.8/10
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
- Ingredients listed
- 6 ingredients listedlargest listed: Creatine 2,500 mg
- Price per serving
- $1.63$49.00 · 30 servings
- Testing
- 3rd-party listed · no public lab certificate
Multi-ingredient bundle
Status as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Score & research context 6.7/10
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.
- Ingredients listed
- 8 ingredients listedlargest listed: Creatine 3,000 mg
- Price per serving
- $4.30$129.00 · 30 servings
- Testing
- 3rd-party listed · no public lab certificate
Multi-ingredient bundle
Status as recorded in the catalog from brand materials; not independently verified by NO1GEVITY.
Score & research context 6.1/10
Editorial score, not proof that this product works. Research-dose calculations are not dosing advice.